Intel Celeron N2807 versus Intel Celeron N2830
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron N2807 et Intel Celeron N2830 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron N2807
- Environ 5% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 105°C versus 100°C
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 4.3 Watt versus 7.5 Watt
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1391 versus 1196
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1391 versus 1196
| Caractéristiques | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C versus 100°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.3 Watt versus 7.5 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1391 versus 1196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1391 versus 1196 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron N2830
- Environ 12% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.41 GHz versus 2.16 GHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 627 versus 565
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 550 versus 486
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 201 versus 160
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 356 versus 322
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.616 versus 1.295
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6.627 versus 4.311
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.092 versus 0.068
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.261 versus 0.225
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 0.905 versus 0.713
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.41 GHz versus 2.16 GHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 627 versus 565 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 550 versus 486 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 201 versus 160 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 356 versus 322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.616 versus 1.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.627 versus 4.311 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.092 versus 0.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.261 versus 0.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.905 versus 0.713 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2807
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N2830
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron N2807 | Intel Celeron N2830 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 565 | 627 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 486 | 550 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 160 | 201 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 322 | 356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.295 | 1.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.311 | 6.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.068 | 0.092 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.225 | 0.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.713 | 0.905 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1391 | 1196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1391 | 1196 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron N2807 | Intel Celeron N2830 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Bay Trail | Bay Trail |
| Date de sortie | 23 February 2014 | 23 February 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $107 | $107 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3186 | 3187 |
| Processor Number | N2807 | N2830 |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.58 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
| Cache L1 | 112 KB | 112 KB |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.16 GHz | 2.41 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Rangée de tension VID | 0.40V – 1.14V | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 2 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3L 1333 |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 313 MHz | 313 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 750 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 2 | 2 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 25mm x 27mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2.5 W | 4.5 W |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.3 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre des ports USB | 5 | 5 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 | 1x4 |
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | 2 |
| Révision USB | 3.0 and 2.0 | 3.0 and 2.0 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron N2807 avec des autres
IntelCeleron N2807 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T8300
IntelCeleron N2807 vs
IntelCore i3-350M
IntelCeleron N2807 vs
IntelCeleron N2830
