Intel Core i5-5675C versus AMD A10-6790K
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i5-5675C et AMD A10-6790K pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-5675C
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 32 nm SOI
- Environ 54% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2234 versus 1556
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 5606 versus 3089
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 989 versus 527
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3577 versus 1464
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 75.856 versus 16.537
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3649 versus 2797
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3649 versus 2797
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 32 nm SOI |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2234 versus 1556 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5606 versus 3089 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 989 versus 527 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3577 versus 1464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.856 versus 16.537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 versus 2797 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 versus 2797 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-6790K
- Processeur est ouvert; un multiplicateur ouvert soutien le overclocking plus facile
- Environ 19% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.3 GHz versus 3.60 GHz
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.233 versus 3.323
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.536 versus 0.432
- 19.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.913 versus 0.601
- 11.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.233 versus 6.401
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5588 versus 3360
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5588 versus 3360
| Caractéristiques | |
| Ouvert | Ouvert versus barré |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.3 GHz versus 3.60 GHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 versus 3.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.536 versus 0.432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.913 versus 0.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.233 versus 6.401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5588 versus 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5588 versus 3360 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-5675C
CPU 2: AMD A10-6790K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i5-5675C | AMD A10-6790K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2234 | 1556 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5606 | 3089 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 989 | 527 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3577 | 1464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.323 | 4.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.856 | 16.537 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.432 | 0.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.601 | 11.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.401 | 71.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 | 2797 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 5588 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 | 2797 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 5588 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i5-5675C | AMD A10-6790K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Broadwell | Richland |
| Date de sortie | Q2'15 | October 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1271 | 1258 |
| Processor Number | i5-5675C | |
| Série | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops |
| Status | Launched | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| OPN PIB | AD679KWOHLBOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD679KWOA44HL | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.60 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 192 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 74°C | |
| Compte de transistor | 1178 million | |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x1622 | |
| eDRAM | 128 MB | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 32 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 6200 | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 844 MHz | |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 384 | |
| Nombre de pipelines | 384 | |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 37 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 2.10 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1150 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCA 2013D | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i5-5675C avec des autres
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCore i7-4770S
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDPRO A6-8550B
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCore i7-9700KF
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDRyzen 5 3500
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDAthlon 3000G
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCeleron G4950
