Intel Pentium N4200 versus Intel Core i5-3340M
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Pentium N4200 et Intel Core i5-3340M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium N4200
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 4x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 5.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 6 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.7 versus 2.146
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.677 versus 2.581
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3147 versus 3067
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3147 versus 3067
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2016 versus 1 January 2013 |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.7 versus 2.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.677 versus 2.581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3147 versus 3067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3147 versus 3067 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-3340M
- Environ 36% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.40 GHz versus 2.50 GHz
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1647 versus 858
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2694 versus 2170
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 617 versus 317
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1355 versus 975
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 36.501 versus 14.641
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.26 versus 0.115
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.03 versus 0.711
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.40 GHz versus 2.50 GHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1647 versus 858 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2694 versus 2170 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 617 versus 317 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1355 versus 975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 36.501 versus 14.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 versus 0.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.03 versus 0.711 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Pentium N4200
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3340M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Pentium N4200 | Intel Core i5-3340M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 858 | 1647 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2170 | 2694 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 317 | 617 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 975 | 1355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.7 | 2.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 36.501 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.115 | 0.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.711 | 1.03 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.677 | 2.581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 659 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1844 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3147 | 3067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 659 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1844 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3147 | 3067 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Pentium N4200 | Intel Core i5-3340M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Apollo Lake | Ivy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2016 | 1 January 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $161 | $225 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2313 | 2306 |
| Prix maintenant | $196.49 | $79.95 |
| Processor Number | N4200 | i5-3340M |
| Série | Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.02 | 15.66 |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 2.70 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 105 °C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.50 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Taille de dé | 118 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
| Cache L3 | 3072 KB | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x5A84 | 0x166 |
| Unités d’éxécution | 18 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 750 MHz | 1.25 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.25 GHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
| CRT | ||
| SDVO | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 24mm x 31mm | 37.5 x 37.5mm (rPGA988B); 31.0 x 24.0mm (BGA1023) |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1296 | FCPGA988, FCBGA1023 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| LAN integré | ||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 6 | 16 |
| Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | |
| Nombre des ports USB | 8 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| Révision USB | 2.0/3.0 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® AVX | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Pentium N4200 avec des autres
IntelPentium N4200 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SU9300
IntelPentium N4200 vs
IntelPentium 967
IntelPentium N4200 vs
IntelCore i7-4500U
IntelPentium N4200 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelPentium N4200 vs
AMDA4-9120e
