AMD Radeon 530 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 530
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1024 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1024 MHz versus 980 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 24.58 GTexel/s versus 15.68 GTexel / s
- Environ 6% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 800 GFLOPs versus 752.6 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 1802 MHz
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1030 versus 793
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 versus 149
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5014 versus 3866
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2021 versus 1589
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2021 versus 1589
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 versus 345
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1024 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s versus 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 800 GFLOPs versus 752.6 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 1802 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1030 versus 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 versus 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5014 versus 3866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 versus 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 versus 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 versus 345 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 versus 2246
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 versus 2246
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 versus 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 versus 2246 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1030 | 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5014 | 3866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2246 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2246 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | 345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Meso | GK107 |
| Conception | Radeon 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 3rd Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1099 | 1301 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1024 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 800 GFLOPs | 752.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 20/24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 1802 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3/GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon 530 avec des autres
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5300
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9700
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIRadeon X850 PRO
AMDRadeon 530 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450A
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX
