AMD Radeon 540 versus AMD Radeon R9 M380
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 540 and AMD Radeon R9 M380 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 540
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1124 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35524 versus 12565
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2355 versus 536
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2355 versus 536
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 versus 2855
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 versus 2855
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 5 May 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 versus 12565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 versus 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 versus 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 2855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 2855 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M380
- 1280x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,536 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- 250x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz versus 6 Gbps
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 versus 248
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2765 versus 1404
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3688 versus 1726
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3688 versus 1726
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz versus 6 Gbps |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 versus 248 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2765 versus 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 versus 1726 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 versus 1726 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 540
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M380
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon 540 | AMD Radeon R9 M380 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 248 | 509 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1404 | 2765 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 | 12565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 | 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 | 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 2855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 2855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1726 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1726 | 3688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon 540 | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | 4th Gen GCN | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Topaz | Strato |
Conception | AMD Radeon 500 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 873 | 876 |
Genre | Notebook | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 8 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,536 gflops |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Texture Units | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s | |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Eyefinity | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 48 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6 Gbps | 1500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized |