AMD Radeon HD 7790 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7790 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7790
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 823 MHz
- Environ 53% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 85 Watt versus 130 Watt
- Environ 7% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 5600 MHz
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.763 versus 32.718
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.646 versus 3.143
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.284 versus 56.509
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.744 versus 67.697
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2013 versus 22 August 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 823 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt versus 130 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 5600 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 versus 32.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 versus 3.143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 versus 56.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 versus 67.697 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- Environ 52% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 85.25 GTexel / s versus 56 GTexel / s
- Environ 29% de pipelines plus haut: 1152 versus 896
- Environ 14% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,046 gflops versus 1,792 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1536 MB versus 1 GB
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 versus 828.247
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 versus 5087
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 versus 988
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 versus 2061
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 versus 5087
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 versus 988
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 versus 2061
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 85.25 GTexel / s versus 56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 versus 896 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,046 gflops versus 1,792 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1536 MB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 versus 828.247 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 versus 5087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 2061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 versus 5087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 2061 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7790
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7790 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 | 32.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 | 1021.371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 | 3.143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 | 56.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 | 67.697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 | 5983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 988 | 3665 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2061 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 | 5983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 988 | 3665 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2061 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 7790 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Bonaire | GK104 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2013 | 22 August 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 837 | 839 |
Prix maintenant | $134.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.57 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 823 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 1152 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 130 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 888 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 183 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |