AMD Radeon HD 7790 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7790 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7790
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 56 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec
- Environ 43% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,792 gflops versus 1,256 gflops
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 85 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3090 versus 2717
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 versus 371
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14832 versus 10767
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.763 versus 18.251
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 828.247 versus 665.068
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.646 versus 1.9
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.284 versus 36.241
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.744 versus 62.895
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5087 versus 4175
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5087 versus 4175
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2013 versus 1 October 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops versus 1,256 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 versus 2717 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 versus 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 versus 10767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 versus 18.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 versus 665.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 versus 1.9 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 versus 36.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 versus 62.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 versus 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 versus 4175 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 960 versus 896
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3383 versus 988
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 versus 2061
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3383 versus 988
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 versus 2061
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 960 versus 896 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 2061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 2061 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7790
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7790 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 | 2717 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 | 10767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 | 18.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 | 665.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 | 1.9 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 | 36.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 | 62.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 | 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 988 | 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2061 | 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 | 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 988 | 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2061 | 3334 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 7790 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Bonaire | GK104 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2013 | 1 October 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 836 | 837 |
Prix maintenant | $134.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.57 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops | 1,256 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 960 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s | 48.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 183 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |