AMD Radeon HD 7790 versus AMD Radeon HD 6850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7790 and AMD Radeon HD 6850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7790
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 51% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 56 GTexel / s versus 37.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,792 gflops versus 1,488.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 49% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 85 Watt versus 127 Watt
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3090 versus 1965
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 versus 432
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.763 versus 13.033
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.646 versus 1.333
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.284 versus 32.609
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.744 versus 139.45
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5087 versus 3489
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5087 versus 3489
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2013 versus 21 October 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s versus 37.2 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops versus 1,488.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt versus 127 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 versus 1965 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 versus 432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 versus 13.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 versus 1.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 versus 32.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 versus 139.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 versus 3489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 versus 3489 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6850
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 960 versus 896
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 946.933 versus 828.247
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 988
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 versus 2061
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 988
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 versus 2061
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 960 versus 896 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 946.933 versus 828.247 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 2061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 2061 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7790
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7790 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 | 1965 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | 432 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 | 13.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 | 946.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 | 1.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 | 32.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 | 139.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 | 3489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 988 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2061 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 | 3489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 988 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2061 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 7790 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Bonaire | Barts |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2013 | 21 October 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $179 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 837 | 840 |
Prix maintenant | $134.99 | $99.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.57 | 28.63 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops | 1,488.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 960 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s | 37.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 127 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 1,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 183 mm | 198 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | AGP | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |