AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU versus AMD Radeon Pro 455
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and AMD Radeon Pro 455 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 64% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 versus 3113
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22636 versus 11291
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 versus 33.484
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 versus 573.646
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 versus 2.854
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 versus 44.793
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 versus 148.673
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 30 October 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 versus 3113 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22636 versus 11291 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 versus 33.484 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 versus 573.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 versus 2.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 versus 44.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 versus 148.673 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 455
- 8.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5080 MHz versus 1704 MHz
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 versus 371
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4146 versus 1715
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1762 versus 1177
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 1724
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4146 versus 1715
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1762 versus 1177
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 1724
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz versus 1704 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 versus 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4146 versus 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1762 versus 1177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 1724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4146 versus 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1762 versus 1177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 1724 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 455
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 | 3113 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 705 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22636 | 11291 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | 33.484 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | 573.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | 2.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | 44.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | 148.673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | 4146 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | 1762 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | 4146 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | 1762 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 | 3359 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD Radeon Pro 455 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | Baffin |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 30 October 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 682 | 671 |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 3,000 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,313 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 41.04 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1704 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.28 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU avec des autres
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
ATIFireGL V5100
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
ATIRadeon X600 PRO
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
IntelHD Graphics P4600
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX350
