AMD Radeon Pro 555X versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 555X and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- 2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 907 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 32x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 24
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12706 versus 4657
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.283 versus 27.517
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 versus 354.254
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 versus 1.807
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 versus 20.323
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 versus 29.327
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 versus 1870
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2350 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3309
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 versus 1870
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2350 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3309
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 versus 1 September 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 versus 24 |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12706 versus 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 versus 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 versus 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 versus 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 versus 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 versus 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3309 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12706 | 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3309 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Polaris 21 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 964 | 1234 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz | 350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 189 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5100 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |