AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Pro 555X und Intel UHD Graphics 630 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 10 Monat(e) später
- 2.6x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 907 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 32x mehr Leitungssysteme: 768 vs 24
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12706 vs 4657
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.283 vs 27.517
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 vs 354.254
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 vs 1.807
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 vs 20.323
- 5.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 vs 29.327
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 vs 1870
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2350 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3309
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 vs 1870
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2350 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3309
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 16 July 2018 vs 1 September 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 907 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 768 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12706 vs 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 vs 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 vs 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 vs 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 vs 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 vs 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3309 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12706 | 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3309 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Codename | Polaris 21 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Startdatum | 16 July 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 964 | 1234 |
Typ | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 907 MHz | 350 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 768 | 24 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,000 million | 189 million |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 460.8 gflops | |
Texturfüllrate | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5100 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync |