AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555X and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12706 vs 4657
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.283 vs 27.517
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 vs 354.254
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 vs 1.807
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 vs 20.323
- 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 vs 29.327
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 vs 1870
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2350 vs 1596
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3309
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 vs 1870
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2350 vs 1596
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 1 September 2017 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12706 vs 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 vs 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 vs 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 vs 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 vs 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 vs 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3309 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12706 | 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3309 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 964 | 1234 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |