AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 versus NVIDIA Tesla P40
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 and NVIDIA Tesla P40 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3840
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12984 versus 12678
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 805 versus 450
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71464 versus 53461
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 versus 1214.142
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13339 versus 9538
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13339 versus 9538
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 13 September 2016 |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 3840 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12984 versus 12678 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 805 versus 450 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71464 versus 53461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 versus 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 versus 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 versus 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1303 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1531 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 367.4 GTexel / s versus 345.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 6% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,758 gflops versus 11,059 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 24 GB versus 16 GB
- 6.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10008 MHz versus 1572 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 300.355 versus 142.691
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3559.383 versus 1729.558
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.757 versus 12.693
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 versus 111.376
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1303 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1531 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 367.4 GTexel / s versus 345.6 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 11,758 gflops versus 11,059 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 16 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10008 MHz versus 1572 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 versus 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 versus 1729.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 versus 12.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 versus 111.376 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12984 | 12678 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 805 | 450 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71464 | 53461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | 300.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | 3559.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | 19.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | 204.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 | 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3340 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Vega 10 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 13 September 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 226 | 229 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,699 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1350 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1250 MHz | 1303 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops | 11,758 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3840 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 345.6 GTexel / s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 11,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB / s | 480.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1572 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5X |