AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 249.6 GTexel/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 versus 1729.558
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 versus 3709
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 versus 3353
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 versus 3709
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 versus 27 June 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 versus 1729.558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 versus 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 versus 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1250 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1350 MHz versus 1300 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3072
- 50x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 12500 million
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1572 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 versus 11300
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 versus 784
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71252 versus 53826
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 142.691 versus 135.416
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 versus 883.876
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13339 versus 11925
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13339 versus 11925
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1250 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1350 MHz versus 1300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 3072 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 12500 million |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1572 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 versus 11300 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 versus 784 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71252 versus 53826 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 versus 135.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 versus 12.678 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 versus 883.876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 versus 11925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 versus 11925 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 12920 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 797 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53826 | 71252 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 142.691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 1729.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 12.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 1396.172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | Greenland | Vega 10 |
| Génération GCN | GCN 5.0 | |
| Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 237 | 240 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 250 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 1572 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
