AMD Radeon R6 Graphics versus AMD Radeon R7 260
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R6 Graphics and AMD Radeon R7 260 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- 7.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 115 Watt
| Date de sortie | 17 September 2014 versus 17 December 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 115 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 260
- Environ 83% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 600 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 48 GTexel / s versus 15.72 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- 3.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,536 gflops versus 503.0 gflops
- 4.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2892 versus 616
- 4.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 versus 137
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.189 versus 11.201
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 798.239 versus 224.132
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.223 versus 0.942
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.294 versus 19.267
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 240.395 versus 45.165
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s versus 15.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops versus 503.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2892 versus 616 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 versus 137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.189 versus 11.201 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 798.239 versus 224.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.223 versus 0.942 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.294 versus 19.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 240.395 versus 45.165 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 616 | 2892 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 137 | 559 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4083 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.201 | 26.189 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 224.132 | 798.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.942 | 4.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.267 | 45.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 45.165 | 240.395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 860 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1784 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3182 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 860 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1784 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3182 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 260 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Spectre | Bonaire |
| Date de sortie | 17 September 2014 | 17 December 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1403 | 570 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.11 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 600 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 533 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 503.0 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.72 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 2,080 million |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 170 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 104 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||

