AMD Radeon R7 350 versus NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 350
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.6 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 819.2 gflops versus 762.6 gflops
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7742 versus 6203
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 versus 312.94
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.719 versus 1.83
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 versus 27.833
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 versus 103.937
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops versus 762.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7742 versus 6203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 versus 312.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.719 versus 1.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 versus 27.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 versus 103.937 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 800 MHz
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 4500 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 versus 25.507
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 versus 2072
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 versus 3122
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 versus 2072
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 versus 3122
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 4500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 versus 25.507 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 versus 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 versus 3122 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7742 | 6203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.507 | 28.91 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | 312.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.719 | 1.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | 27.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | 103.937 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 2486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 3587 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 2486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 3587 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1513 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | GM108 |
| Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 | 28 June 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1099 | 1100 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 40.1 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 350 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9700 PRO
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7000 IGP
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDRadeon R5 310 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDRadeon R5 A330
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDRadeon 520
