AMD Radeon R7 350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350

• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7742 vs 6188
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 vs 312.94
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.719 vs 1.83
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 vs 27.833
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 vs 103.937

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 vs 25.507
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 vs 2072
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 vs 3122
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 vs 2072
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 vs 3122

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7742 6188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.507 28.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	647.813 312.94
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.719 1.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.6 27.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.558 103.937
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2072 2486
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3122 3587
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2072 2486
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3122 3587
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3357

Compare specifications (specs)