AMD Radeon R7 370 versus AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 370 and AMD Radeon R6 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 370
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 63% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 975 MHz versus 600 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 62.4 GTexel / s versus 15.72 GTexel / s
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 384
- 4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,997 gflops versus 503.0 gflops
- 7.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4499 versus 616
- 4.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 610 versus 137
- 21.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 versus 4083
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.514 versus 11.201
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1506.404 versus 224.132
- 7.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.267 versus 0.942
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.279 versus 19.267
- 8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 359.237 versus 45.165
- 8.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7102 versus 860
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 1784
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3182
- 8.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7102 versus 860
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 1784
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3182
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 17 September 2014 |
Vitesse augmenté | 975 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.4 GTexel / s versus 15.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,997 gflops versus 503.0 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4499 versus 616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 610 versus 137 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 versus 4083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 versus 11.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 versus 224.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 versus 0.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 versus 19.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 versus 45.165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 versus 860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 1784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 versus 860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 1784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3182 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
- 7.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 110 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 110 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 370
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 370 | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4499 | 616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 610 | 137 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 | 4083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 | 11.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | 224.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | 0.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | 19.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | 45.165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 | 860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 1784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 | 860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 1784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3182 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 370 | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Trinidad | Spectre |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 17 September 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 411 | 1403 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 975 MHz | 600 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,997 gflops | 503.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.4 GTexel / s | 15.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 2,410 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 533 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Longeur | 152 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 975 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |