AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus AMD Radeon R5 M230
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and AMD Radeon R5 M230 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- 4.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 4596
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 versus 8.593
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 versus 143.386
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 versus 0.852
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 versus 15.789
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 versus 49.196
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 versus 985
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 versus 1927
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2401
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 4596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 versus 8.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 versus 143.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 versus 0.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 versus 15.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 versus 49.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 versus 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 versus 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2401 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M230
- 4.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 825 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 855 MHz versus 758 MHz
- Environ 4% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.1 GTexel / s versus 16.46 GTexel / s
- Environ 4% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 547.2 gflops versus 526.8 gflops
- 29.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 985 versus 33.5
- 56.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 versus 33.9
- 40x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2401 versus 60
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 825 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 855 MHz versus 758 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.1 GTexel / s versus 16.46 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 547.2 gflops versus 526.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 versus 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 versus 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 versus 60 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 4596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 8.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 143.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 0.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 15.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 49.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 2401 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 416 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Wani | Jet |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 7 January 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1440 | 1443 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 1,040 million |
| Unités de Compute | 5 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 620i
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO 512
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5730
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M360
