AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 16.46 GTexel / s versus 7.8 billion / sec
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 526.8 gflops versus 249.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 11.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 2012
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 versus 4.25
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 versus 929
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 versus 1210
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1524
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 15 January 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s versus 7.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops versus 249.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 versus 4.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 versus 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 versus 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1524 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- 6.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1300 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 27.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 929 versus 33.5
- 35.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 versus 33.9
- 25.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1524 versus 60
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1300 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 929 versus 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1210 versus 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1524 versus 60 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 4.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 1524 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 536 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Wani | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 15 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1440 | 1437 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | 249.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | 7.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 1,170 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 800 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |