AMD Radeon R9 380X versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 380X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 380X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 138.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 970 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9685 versus 9566
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9685 versus 9566
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3690
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3690
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 3335
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 3335
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 November 2015 versus 19 September 2014 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 versus 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 versus 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3335 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1216 MHz versus 970 MHz
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 144 billion / sec versus 124.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,981 gflops versus 3,973 gflops
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 165 Watt versus 190 Watt
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11129 versus 6224
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 798 versus 667
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4328 versus 3053
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1216 MHz versus 970 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 144 billion / sec versus 124.2 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,981 gflops versus 3,973 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt versus 190 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11129 versus 6224 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 798 versus 667 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4328 versus 3053 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6224 | 11129 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 | 798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 | 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 | 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 | 4328 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1348.307 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 477.015 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Antigua | GM204 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 19 November 2015 | 19 September 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $549 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 313 | 358 |
| Prix maintenant | $528.44 | $605.06 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.61 | 21.18 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz | 1216 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,973 gflops | 4,981 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.2 GTexel / s | 144 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 165 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2 x 6-pin | 2x 6-pins |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 182.4 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 380X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370 LP
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580
