AMD Radeon R9 380X versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 380X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 380X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 32% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 190 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 138.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 970 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3695
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3695
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 3338
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 3338
- 2.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3053 versus 1320
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 November 2015 versus 2 June 2015 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3338 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 versus 1320 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1075 MHz versus 970 MHz
- Environ 42% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 176 billion / sec versus 124.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 38% de pipelines plus haut: 2816 versus 2048
- Environ 53% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,060 gflops versus 3,973 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13783 versus 6153
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 versus 671
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 versus 9685
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 versus 9685
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1075 MHz versus 970 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 176 billion / sec versus 124.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2816 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 6,060 gflops versus 3,973 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13783 versus 6153 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 versus 671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 versus 9685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 versus 9685 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6153 | 13783 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 671 | 853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 | 10471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 | 10471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3338 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 | 1320 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Antigua | GM200 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 19 November 2015 | 2 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $649 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 310 | 312 |
| Prix maintenant | $528.44 | $679.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.61 | 23.43 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,973 gflops | 6,060 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2816 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.2 GTexel / s | 176 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 8,000 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2816 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2 x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 182.4 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 380X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDFireStream 9250
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2200
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
