AMD Radeon R9 M390 versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M390 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 5 mois plus tard
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 versus 7.457
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 versus 512.081
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 versus 1643
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 versus 1643
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 versus 7 January 2010 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 versus 7.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 versus 512.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 versus 1643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 versus 1643 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3314 versus 1232
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3314 versus 1232
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3314 versus 1232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3314 versus 1232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20286 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 7.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 512.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 1643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 1643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 763 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M390 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | Broadway |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 | 7 January 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 856 | 853 |
| Genre | Laptop | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| HDMI 1.3a | ||
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 500 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 800.0 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | |
| Pipelines | 800 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M390 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
