AMD Radeon R9 M390 versus AMD FirePro M6100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M390 and AMD FirePro M6100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 versus 39.059
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 versus 750.731
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 versus 3.395
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 versus 57.283
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 versus 166.915
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 versus 4537
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 2517
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 versus 4537
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 2517
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 versus 16 October 2013 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 versus 39.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 versus 750.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 versus 3.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 versus 57.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 versus 166.915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 versus 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 versus 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 2517 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M6100
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 versus 20286
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1803 versus 1232
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1803 versus 1232
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 versus 20286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 versus 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 versus 1232 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6100
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD FirePro M6100 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20286 | 52486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 39.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 750.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 3.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 57.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 166.915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2517 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2195 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD FirePro M6100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Pitcairn | Saturn |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 | 16 October 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 857 | 860 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 88 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1075 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,651 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.6 GTexel / s | |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |