AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 versus AMD Radeon R9 M390

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon R9 M390 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

versus

AMD Radeon R9 M390

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 versus 1232
2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 versus 1232

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	27 May 2019 versus 09 June 2015
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274 versus 1232
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 versus 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274 versus 1232
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 versus 3351

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390

Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20286 versus 14144
Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 versus 25.896
Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 versus 486.804
Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 versus 2.503
Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 versus 53.111
2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 versus 100.658
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 versus 2524
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 versus 2524

Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL	20286 versus 14144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	44.394 versus 25.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	881.959 versus 486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.028 versus 2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	73.782 versus 53.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	241.868 versus 100.658
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6227 versus 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6227 versus 2524

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14144

20286

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.896

44.394

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

486.804

881.959

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.503

4.028

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

53.111

73.782

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

100.658

241.868

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

6227

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

1232

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

6227

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

1232

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3351

Nom	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	AMD Radeon R9 M390
PassMark - G3D Mark	2415
PassMark - G2D Mark	415
Geekbench - OpenCL	14144	20286
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.896	44.394
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	486.804	881.959
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.503	4.028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.111	73.782
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	100.658	241.868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2524	6227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274	1232
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2524	6227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274	1232
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3351

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	AMD Radeon R9 M390
Essentiel
Architecture	Polaris	GCN
Nom de code	Lexa	Pitcairn
Date de sortie	27 May 2019	09 June 2015
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$199
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	855	856
Genre	Workstation
Conception		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1082 MHz
Unités de Compute	10
Vitesse du noyau	925 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	86.56 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Pixel fill rate	17.31 GPixel/s
Stream Processors	640
Taux de remplissage de la texture	34.62 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt
Compte de transistor	2200 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	4x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Hauteur	Half Height
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Longeur	6.6" (168 mm)
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	96 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 bit	256 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	4000 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
DualGraphics
PowerTune
Graphiques changeables
ZeroCore