AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) versus AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 72% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 137.5 GTexel / s versus 80 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1280
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 5.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6600 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 versus 55.001
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 versus 952.668
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 versus 1.767
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 versus 64.456
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 versus 294.215
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 6821
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 6821
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3697 versus 1651
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 versus 5 March 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 137.5 GTexel / s versus 80 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1280 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 versus 55.001 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 versus 952.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 versus 1.767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 versus 64.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 versus 294.215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 6821 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3697 versus 1651 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
- 522.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,560 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77430 versus 34588
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1674
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 1674
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,560 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77430 versus 34588 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 1674 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34588 | 77430 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 55.001 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 952.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 1.767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 64.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 294.215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3697 | 1651 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4637 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Ellesmere | Pitcairn |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 | 5 March 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549.99 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 482 | 477 |
Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | 2,560 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | 1024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 137.5 GTexel / s | 80 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
VGA | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |