AMD Radeon RX 570 versus AMD Radeon R7 370
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 570 and AMD Radeon R7 370 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206-1244 MHz versus 975 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 62.4 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 1024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 7.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 975 MHz
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 versus 4499
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 versus 608
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 versus 72.514
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 versus 7.267
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 versus 359.237
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 versus 7102
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 versus 7102
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 18 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz versus 975 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 62.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1024 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 975 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 versus 4499 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 versus 608 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 versus 72.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 versus 7.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 versus 359.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 versus 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 versus 7102 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 370
- 391.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,997 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 versus 35694
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1506.404 versus 1083.926
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.279 versus 79.029
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 3624
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 3624
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1499 versus 878
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,997 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 versus 35694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 versus 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 versus 79.029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 versus 878 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 570 | AMD Radeon R7 370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 4499 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 608 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35694 | 86561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 72.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 1506.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 7.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 116.279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 359.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 878 | 1499 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 570 | AMD Radeon R7 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Trinidad |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 18 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $149 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 411 | 412 |
Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz | 975 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 926-1168 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | 1,997 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | 1024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s | 62.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 110 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 152 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 975 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DDMA audio | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |