AMD Radeon RX 570 versus AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 570 and AMD Radeon RX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 versus 1022.932
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 185 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 versus 1022.932 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz
- Environ 21% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 159.23 GTexel/s
- Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 2048
- Environ 22% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6.2 TFLOPs versus 5.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 6967
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 626
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 36107
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 105.688
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 8.251
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 79.029
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 520.089
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 9172
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 3624
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 9172
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 3624
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 versus 880
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 159.23 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs versus 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 versus 6967 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 626 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 36107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 105.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 8.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 79.029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 520.089 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 versus 880 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 570 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 8827 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 767 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 | 39028 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 116.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 1022.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 9.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 84.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 607.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 | 1005 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 570 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Polaris 20 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | Radeon RX 500 Series |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | 4th Gen |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $229 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 405 | 341 |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | $169.99 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | 76.21 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926-1168 MHz | 1257 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | 6.2 TFLOPs |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 39.81 GP/s | 42.88 GP/s |
| Render output units | 32 | 32 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | 2304 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
| Texture Units | 128 | 144 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| VR Ready | ||

