AMD Radeon RX 570 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 570 und AMD Radeon RX 580 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 570
- Etwa 23% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 150 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 vs 1022.932
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 185 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 vs 1022.932 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 580
- Etwa 36% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1257 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- Etwa 11% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1340 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
- Etwa 21% höhere Texturfüllrate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 159.23 GTexel/s
- Etwa 13% höhere Leitungssysteme: 2304 vs 2048
- Etwa 22% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 6.2 TFLOPs vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- Etwa 14% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 vs 6967
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 626
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 vs 36107
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 vs 105.688
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 vs 8.251
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 vs 79.029
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 520.089
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 vs 9172
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3624
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 vs 9172
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3624
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 vs 880
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1257 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1340 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 159.23 GTexel/s |
| Leitungssysteme | 2304 vs 2048 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 6.2 TFLOPs vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 vs 6967 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 vs 626 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 vs 36107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 vs 105.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 vs 8.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 vs 79.029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 vs 520.089 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 vs 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 vs 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 vs 880 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 8827 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 767 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 | 39028 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 116.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 1022.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 9.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 84.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 607.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 | 1005 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon RX 570 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Polaris 20 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | Radeon RX 500 Series |
| GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | 4th Gen |
| Startdatum | 18 April 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $169 | $229 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 405 | 341 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $149.99 | $169.99 |
| Typ | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 59.00 | 76.21 |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1206-1244 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 926-1168 MHz | 1257 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 5.1 TFLOPs | 6.2 TFLOPs |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 2048 | 2304 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 39.81 GP/s | 42.88 GP/s |
| Render output units | 32 | 32 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | 2304 |
| Texturfüllrate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
| Texture Units | 128 | 144 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Überbrückungsfreies CrossFire | ||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 450 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| VR Ready | ||

