AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon Pro SSG pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16448 versus 10972
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 versus 588
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 versus 170.923
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 versus 3178.443
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 versus 16.732
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 173.59
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 versus 1231.051
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 versus 11029
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 versus 11029
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 8 August 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16448 versus 10972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 versus 588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 versus 170.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 versus 3178.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 versus 16.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 173.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 versus 1231.051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 versus 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 versus 11029 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Environ 26% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 384.0 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 versus 3720
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 versus 3720
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 384.0 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 versus 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 versus 3720 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16448 | 10972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 588 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77282 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 170.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3178.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 16.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 173.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1231.051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2137 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $6,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 162 | 160 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIARTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
