AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1680 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16537 versus 14147
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 versus 747
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77238 versus 71612
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 versus 217.04
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 versus 3119.736
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 versus 21.707
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 133.975
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 versus 1141.283
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9470 versus 7482
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 7 January 2019 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1680 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16537 versus 14147 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 versus 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77238 versus 71612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 versus 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 versus 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 versus 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 versus 1141.283 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9470 versus 7482 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 41% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 14699
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3720
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3369
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 14699
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3720
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3369
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3369 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16537 | 14147 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77238 | 71612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9470 | 7482 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 160 | 159 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 10,800 million |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Pipelines | 1920 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |