Apple M1 Pro 14-core versus AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Apple M1 Pro 14-core and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Mémoire, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Apple M1 Pro 14-core
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 15x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20379 versus 14699
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20379 versus 14699
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7440 versus 3720
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7440 versus 3720
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6721 versus 3369
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6721 versus 3369
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 26 Oct 2021 versus 7 July 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20379 versus 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20379 versus 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 versus 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 versus 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6721 versus 3369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6721 versus 3369 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1296 MHz
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77238 versus 39768
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1296 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77238 versus 39768 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Apple M1 Pro 14-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Apple M1 Pro 14-core | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39768 | 77238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20379 | 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20379 | 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6721 | 3369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6721 | 3369 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16537 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9470 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Apple M1 Pro 14-core | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Date de sortie | 26 Oct 2021 | 7 July 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 163 | 160 |
| Architecture | RDNA | |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1296 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 5 nm | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.644 TFLOPS | 9.75 TFLOPs |
| Pipelines | 14 | |
| Render output units | 56 | 64 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | |
Mémoire |
||
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 204.8 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR6 |
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Apple M1 Pro 14-core avec des autres
AppleM1 Pro 14-core vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000
AppleM1 Pro 14-core vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
AppleM1 Pro 14-core vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
AppleM1 Pro 14-core vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500 XT
AppleM1 Pro 14-core vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
AppleM1 Pro 14-core vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
