AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon Pro SSG pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 94% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14495 versus 10972
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 versus 588
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 170.923
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 versus 3178.443
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 16.732
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 173.59
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11536 versus 11029
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11536 versus 11029
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 8 August 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14495 versus 10972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 versus 588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 170.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 versus 3178.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 16.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 173.59 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 versus 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 versus 11029 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Environ 55% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 384.0 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1231.051 versus 1036.448
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 versus 3723
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 versus 3723
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 384.0 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 versus 1036.448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 versus 3723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 versus 3723 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14495 | 10972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 588 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 170.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 3178.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 16.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 173.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1231.051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $6,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 176 | 157 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
