AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1168 MHz
- Environ 34% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1284 MHz
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14500 versus 7708
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 versus 661
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 66238 versus 34838
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 115.237
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 versus 1890.261
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 10.121
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 149.333
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 versus 614.542
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11536 versus 9258
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11536 versus 9258
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8499 versus 3782
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 15 October 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1168 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1284 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 versus 7708 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 versus 661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66238 versus 34838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 115.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 versus 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 149.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 versus 614.542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 versus 3782 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 180 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 | 7708 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66238 | 34838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 115.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 149.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 614.542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 3782 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 15 October 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 335 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1284 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 5,700 million |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |