AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1382 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14500 versus 13327
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 versus 750
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 190.25
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 versus 3611.018
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 17.789
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 181.113
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8499 versus 7074
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 27 June 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1382 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 versus 13327 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 versus 750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 190.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 versus 3611.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 17.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 181.113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 versus 7074 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Environ 65% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 409.6 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 75705 versus 66240
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 versus 1036.448
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12980 versus 11536
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12980 versus 11536
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 409.6 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75705 versus 66240 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 versus 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12980 versus 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12980 versus 11536 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 | 13327 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66240 | 75705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 190.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 3611.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 17.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 181.113 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1373.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 7074 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 198 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1382 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | 409.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |