AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1405 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 66234 versus 65520
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 146.609
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 163.551
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 4 November 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1405 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66234 versus 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 146.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 163.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3355 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- Environ 53% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 379.7 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 3686.851
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 21.941
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 1036.448
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 versus 11536
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 versus 11536
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 versus 8499
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 3686.851 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 21.941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 1036.448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 versus 11536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 versus 11536 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 versus 8499 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14497 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66234 | 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 146.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 4303.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 23.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 163.551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1382.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 10139 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | GP102 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 4 November 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $1,199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 216 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
