AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 und NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 4% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1465 MHz vs 1405 MHz
- Etwa 9% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- Etwa 39% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66234 vs 65520
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 146.609
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 163.551
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 4 November 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz vs 1405 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66234 vs 65520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 146.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 163.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3355 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- Etwa 53% höhere Texturfüllrate: 379.7 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s
- Um etwa 50% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 vs 3686.851
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 vs 21.941
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 vs 1036.448
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 vs 11536
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 vs 11536
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 vs 8499
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 379.7 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 vs 3686.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 vs 21.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 vs 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 vs 11536 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 vs 8499 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14497 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66234 | 65520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 146.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 4303.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 23.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 163.551 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1382.954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 10139 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | Pascal |
Codename | Navi 10 | GP102 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 4 November 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $350 | $1,199 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 177 | 216 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texturfüllrate | 248.4 GT/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 11,800 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 12,150 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 16 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 3840 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 11408 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |