AMD Radeon RX 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 1046 MHz
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1536
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 24% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 185 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 7012 MHz
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 5939
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 562
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 18068
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 49.824
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 4.899
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 44.06
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 103.884
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 7412
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 7412
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 1046 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1536 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 7012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 versus 5939 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 562 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 18068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- 537.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 versus 1022.932
- 2.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2155 versus 1005
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 versus 1022.932 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 versus 1005 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 5939 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 | 562 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 | 18068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 | 2155 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GK104 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 30 May 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 341 | 515 |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $449.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | 15.45 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | 3,333 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | 134 billion / sec |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 224.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 580 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
ATIFireMV 2260
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000
