AMD Radeon RX 580 versus NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 861 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 132.9 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 2048
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 21% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 6612 MHz
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 659
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 29578
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 99.169
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 7.899
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 53.364
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 498.551
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 3324
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 3324
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 29 June 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 861 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 2048 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 6612 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 659 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 29578 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 99.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 7.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 53.364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 498.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 3677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 3677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3324 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M5000
- 685.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,252 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9437 versus 8827
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1183.119 versus 1022.932
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12524 versus 11281
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12524 versus 11281
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,252 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 185 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9437 versus 8827 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1183.119 versus 1022.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12524 versus 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12524 versus 11281 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 9437 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 | 659 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 | 29578 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 99.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 1183.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 7.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 53.364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 498.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 12524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 12524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3324 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GM204 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 29 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $2,856.99 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 341 | 342 |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $1,498 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | 7.47 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz | 861 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | 4,252 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 42.88 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
