AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1471 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 330.00 GTexel/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 19% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 210 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 2% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 1572 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13154 versus 12920
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 versus 71252
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 184.405 versus 142.691
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1765.06 versus 1729.558
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14462 versus 13339
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14462 versus 13339
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 August 2017 versus 27 June 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1471 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 330.00 GTexel/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 1572 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13154 versus 12920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 versus 71252 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 184.405 versus 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1765.06 versus 1729.558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14462 versus 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14462 versus 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1250 MHz versus 1156 MHz
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3584
- 1053.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,059 gflops versus 10.5 TFLOPs
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 versus 769
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.693 versus 12.606
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 111.376 versus 79.32
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 versus 1022.925
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1250 MHz versus 1156 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 3584 |
Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops versus 10.5 TFLOPs |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 versus 769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 versus 12.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 versus 79.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 versus 1022.925 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13154 | 12920 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 | 797 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 | 71252 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 184.405 | 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1765.06 | 1729.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.606 | 12.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.32 | 111.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1022.925 | 1396.172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14462 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14462 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1497 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Date de sortie | 14 August 2017 | 27 June 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 226 | 228 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1471 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 56 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1156 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 10.5 TFLOPs | 11,059 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 94.00 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 330.00 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 12,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 410 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 2048 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1572 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |