NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1156 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1471 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 75% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 210 Watt
- 7.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 versus 768
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 184.405
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 versus 1765.06
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 versus 12.606
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 79.32
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 versus 14462
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 versus 14462
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 versus 14 August 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1156 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1471 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 210 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 versus 768 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 184.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 versus 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 versus 12.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 79.32 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 versus 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 versus 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13093 versus 12900
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 versus 61100
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1022.925 versus 926.614
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1501 versus 1061
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13093 versus 12900 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 versus 61100 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1022.925 versus 926.614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1501 versus 1061 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 | 13093 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | 768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 | 163998 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 184.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 12.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 79.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 1022.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1061 | 1501 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | TU116 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 221 | 224 |
Prix maintenant | $279.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1471 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1156 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 210 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 12,500 million |
Unités de Compute | 56 | |
Performance á point flottant | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Pixel fill rate | 94.00 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 330.00 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 410 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |