AMD Radeon VII versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon VII and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon VII
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1750 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 25% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 432.24 GT/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1572 MHz
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16546 versus 12920
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 92136 versus 71252
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 versus 142.691
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 versus 1729.558
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 versus 12.693
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 versus 27 June 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1572 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16546 versus 12920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92136 versus 71252 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 versus 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 versus 1729.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 versus 12.693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3840
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 versus 790
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 111.376 versus 69.256
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 versus 499.927
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13339 versus 11724
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13339 versus 11724
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 versus 790 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 versus 69.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 versus 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 versus 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 versus 11724 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16546 | 12920 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 790 | 797 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92136 | 71252 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 | 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 | 1729.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 | 12.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 | 111.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 | 1396.172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9325 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Vega 20 | Vega 10 |
Conception | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | |
Génération GCN | 5th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 226 | 229 |
Prix maintenant | $699.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 60 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 3840 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,230 million | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 305 mm | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 W | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 1024 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 1572 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |