AMD Radeon VII versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon VII and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon VII
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 1156 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1750 MHz versus 1471 MHz
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 3584
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16660 versus 13228
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 versus 768
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 versus 184.405
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 versus 1765.06
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 versus 12.606
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9325 versus 6879
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 versus 14 August 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 1156 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz versus 1471 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 3584 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16660 versus 13228 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 versus 768 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 versus 184.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 versus 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 versus 12.606 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9325 versus 6879 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 330.00 GTexel/s versus 432.24 GT/s
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 210 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 versus 91667
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.32 versus 69.256
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1022.925 versus 499.927
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14462 versus 11724
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14462 versus 11724
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 330.00 GTexel/s versus 432.24 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 versus 91667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.32 versus 69.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1022.925 versus 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14462 versus 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14462 versus 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3360 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16660 | 13228 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 91667 | 163998 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 | 184.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 | 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 | 12.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 | 79.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 | 1022.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9325 | 6879 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Vega 20 | Vega 10 |
Conception | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | Radeon RX Vega Series |
Génération GCN | 5th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 225 | 224 |
Prix maintenant | $699.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz | 1471 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 60 | 56 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz | 1156 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | 21 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | 10.5 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | 94.00 GP/s |
Stream Processors | 3840 | 3584 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s | 330.00 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 210 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,230 million | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 305 mm | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 W | 650 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 1024 GB/s | 410 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | 2048 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |