AMD Radeon Vega 10 versus AMD FirePro W4190M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 10 and AMD FirePro W4190M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 10
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1543 versus 1150
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 versus 176
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 357.982 versus 284.018
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.218 versus 1.417
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3082 versus 1704
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3402 versus 2529
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3082 versus 1704
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3402 versus 2529
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 versus 12 November 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1543 versus 1150 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 versus 176 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 357.982 versus 284.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.218 versus 1.417 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3082 versus 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3402 versus 2529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3082 versus 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3402 versus 2529 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W4190M
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 23384 versus 9466
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 versus 3235
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 versus 3235
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23384 versus 9466 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3889 versus 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3889 versus 3235 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 10
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4190M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 10 | AMD FirePro W4190M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1543 | 1150 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 | 176 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9466 | 23384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.485 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 357.982 | 284.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.218 | 1.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.275 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.274 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3082 | 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3402 | 2529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3235 | 3889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3082 | 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3402 | 2529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3235 | 3889 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 797 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 10 | AMD FirePro W4190M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Vega | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Vega Raven Ridge | Opal |
| Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 | 12 November 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 902 | 1057 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 825 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 691.2 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.6 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1200 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||

