AMD Radeon Vega 10 versus AMD FirePro W600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 10 and AMD FirePro W600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 10
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9466 versus 6205
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.485 versus 17.708
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.218 versus 1.857
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.275 versus 36.592
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.274 versus 93.116
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3082 versus 2331
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3402 versus 1555
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3082 versus 2331
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3402 versus 1555
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 versus 13 June 2012 |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9466 versus 6205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.485 versus 17.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.218 versus 1.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.275 versus 36.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.274 versus 93.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3082 versus 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3402 versus 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3082 versus 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3402 versus 1555 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W600
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1683 versus 1543
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 591 versus 358
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 585.463 versus 357.982
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1683 versus 1543 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 versus 358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.463 versus 357.982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3250 versus 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3250 versus 3235 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 10
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 10 | AMD FirePro W600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1543 | 1683 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 | 591 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9466 | 6205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.485 | 17.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 357.982 | 585.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.218 | 1.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.275 | 36.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.274 | 93.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3082 | 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3402 | 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3235 | 3250 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3082 | 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3402 | 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3235 | 3250 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 797 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 10 | AMD FirePro W600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Vega | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Vega Raven Ridge | Cape Verde |
Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 | 13 June 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 902 | 904 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 750 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 768.0 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1200 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 163 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |