AMD Radeon Vega 11 versus AMD Radeon HD 7850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 11 and AMD Radeon HD 7850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 11
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 4% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 57.2 GTexel / s versus 55.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 4% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,830 gflops versus 1,761 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 6.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 225 Watt
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 5 March 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.2 GTexel / s versus 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,830 gflops versus 1,761 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7850
- Environ 45% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 704
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3885 versus 1857
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 versus 478
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.041 versus 41.582
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1028.005 versus 371.843
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.41 versus 3.156
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 72.975 versus 52.449
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6173 versus 2156
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3696 versus 2475
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6173 versus 2156
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3696 versus 2475
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 704 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3885 versus 1857 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 versus 478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.041 versus 41.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 versus 371.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.41 versus 3.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 versus 52.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 versus 248.838 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6173 versus 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 versus 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6173 versus 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 versus 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3343 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1857 | 3885 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 | 567 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13318 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | 47.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | 1028.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | 4.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | 72.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | 249.482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1312 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 11 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Owl | Pitcairn |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 5 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 886 | 520 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Prix maintenant | $449.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,830 gflops | 1,761 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 704 | 1024 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.2 GTexel / s | 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1200 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 153.6 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1200 MHz | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 11 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
ATIRadeon X300
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 PRO
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GX2
