AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 versus 312
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 versus 22.12
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 versus 59.007
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 versus 312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 versus 22.12 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 versus 59.007 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3347 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 620 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1925 versus 1894
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 664.78 versus 176.928
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.003 versus 1.666
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.983 versus 27.603
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2649 versus 2408
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 3170
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2649 versus 2408
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 3170
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 620 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1925 versus 1894 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 664.78 versus 176.928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.003 versus 1.666 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.983 versus 27.603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2649 versus 2408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2649 versus 2408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 3170 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 1925 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 22.12 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 664.78 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 2.003 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 33.983 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 59.007 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 2649 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 2649 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6362 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Raven | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 | 22 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 931 | 929 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,950 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 952.3 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.7 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
AMDRadeon R7 M370
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded
