ATI Radeon HD 5570 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo ATI Radeon HD 5570 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 13 GTexel / s versus 11.2 GTexel / s
- 4.2x plus de pipelines: 400 versus 96
- Environ 93% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 520.0 gflops versus 268.8 gflops
- Environ 28% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 39 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.572 versus 175.385
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.345 versus 9.27
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1160 versus 1064
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 versus 1589
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 2716
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1160 versus 1064
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 versus 1589
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 2716
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 October 2011 versus 14 May 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13 GTexel / s versus 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 520.0 gflops versus 268.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 versus 175.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.345 versus 9.27 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1160 versus 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 versus 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1160 versus 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 versus 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 2716 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 664 versus 480
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 versus 193
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2242 versus 1378
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.698 versus 4.393
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.497 versus 0.454
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 664 versus 480 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 versus 193 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2242 versus 1378 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.698 versus 4.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.497 versus 0.454 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 480 | 664 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 221 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1378 | 2242 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.393 | 5.698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 | 175.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | 0.497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.345 | 9.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1160 | 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1160 | 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 2716 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Turks | GF108 |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 11 October 2011 | 14 May 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1366 | 1368 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 650 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 520.0 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13 GTexel / s | 11.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 716 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 165 mm | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |