AMD Radeon R5 M255 versus ATI Radeon HD 5570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 M255 and ATI Radeon HD 5570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M255
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 925 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 45% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 940 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 74% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 22.56 GTexel / s versus 13 GTexel / s
- Environ 39% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 721.9 gflops versus 520.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 545 versus 476
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4715 versus 1381
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.288 versus 4.393
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.988 versus 0.454
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.164 versus 11.345
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.631 versus 49.016
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1459 versus 1160
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1459 versus 1160
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 October 2014 versus 11 October 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 940 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.56 GTexel / s versus 13 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 721.9 gflops versus 520.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 545 versus 476 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4715 versus 1381 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.288 versus 4.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.988 versus 0.454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.164 versus 11.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.631 versus 49.016 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1459 versus 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1459 versus 1160 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5570
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 400 versus 320
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 197 versus 134
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.572 versus 166.596
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 versus 1715
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 versus 1715
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 400 versus 320 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 197 versus 134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 versus 166.596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 versus 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 versus 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M255
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 M255 | ATI Radeon HD 5570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 545 | 476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 134 | 197 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4715 | 1381 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.288 | 4.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.596 | 235.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.988 | 0.454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.164 | 11.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.631 | 49.016 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1459 | 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1715 | 1883 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1459 | 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1715 | 1883 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3360 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 M255 | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Topaz | Turks |
Conception | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series |
Date de sortie | 12 October 2014 | 11 October 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1364 | 1367 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 940 MHz | 650 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 5 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | 650 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 721.9 gflops | 520.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 400 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.56 GTexel / s | 13 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 716 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 165 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 16 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore |