Intel UHD Graphics 605 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 605 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 605
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 5.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 29 Watt
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 369 versus 322
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1458 versus 1283
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.247 versus 2.471
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.312 versus 0.233
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.219 versus 4.053
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 724 versus 555
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 versus 835
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 versus 1155
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 724 versus 555
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 versus 835
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 versus 1155
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 2 April 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 29 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 369 versus 322 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1458 versus 1283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.247 versus 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.312 versus 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.219 versus 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 versus 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 versus 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 versus 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 versus 1155 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- 4.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 18
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 131 versus 106
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 77.99 versus 52.728
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.018 versus 3.355
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 48 versus 18 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 versus 106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 versus 52.728 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 versus 3.355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 369 | 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 106 | 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1458 | 1283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.247 | 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 52.728 | 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.312 | 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.355 | 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.219 | 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 | 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 | 1155 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 605 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | GF119 |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 2 April 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1550 | 1626 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 18 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 292 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 155.5 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.5 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1024 MB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 605 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300 GS
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600M GS
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 325M
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics
